error on loading lua script files rappelz private server

Error on loading lua script files rappelz private server code#

Lua is a very dynamic language, and what is a great strength also makes for a weakness when you want to prove correctness. However, these are the extent of your options with regards to pre-empting errors before they actually happen.

Error on loading lua script files rappelz private server code#

(And if that contained function definitions, those would need to be executed later on for the code inside those to execute.) Stuck on 'Starting LUA' or 'Requesting x LUA files from the Server' As said in the title, Im stuck in the loading screen loading LUA's. I am quite sure (but not 100%) that the lua equivalent is to loadfile or loadstring, and the respective C equivalent is to try and lua_load() the code, each of which convert readable script to bytecode which you would already need to do before you could actually execute the code in your normal all-is-well usecase. If you want a basic check to see if a script has a valid syntax: Krtek gave an answer for that already. You can even use the -p option to only perform a syntax checking, according to the linked man page : -p load files but do not generate any output file. Your program will also have the advantage the run faster if it is compiled. It will only compile your file to bytecode without executing it. This is basically a sort of unit test, and as such would be pretty heavy. 3 Answers Sorted by: 10 You can use the LUA Compiler.

If you want a flawless test: create a dummy environment with all bells and whistles in place, and see if it crashes anywhere along the way (loading, executing, etc). Lua is too dynamic for what you are looking for. Is that bad? To sum my thoughts up: depending on the script, parameters passed and/or actual implementations of those pre-defined functions you speak of (one might unset itself or others, for example), it is not possible to guarantee things work unless you are willing to narrow down some of your demands. Hell, someone might accidentally redefine one of those functions. Variables, by their very definition, can change as a script is executed. (This was originally meant as a reply to the first comment to Krtek's question, but I ran out of space there and to be honest it works as an answer just fine.)įunctions are essentially values, and thus a named function is actually a variable of that name.